Keep calm. Don’t resist. Believe the government. July 24, 2008
Posted by thomas in : Commentary , 4 comments
The piece of advice that provides this post’s title is not a quote from Orwell’s 1984. It comes from an anti-terrorist attack manual provided by the Chinese government in advance of the Beijing Olympics (from BBC reporter James Reynolds’ excellent China/Olympics blog). The manual also includes sage advice for detecting terrorists like the following (all translations are provided by Reynolds and his “Chinese colleagues”):
Terrorist suspects won’t put a sticker on their faces to say they are terrorists. However they will have some abnormal behaviour that can make us alert, such as:
- Those who look panicked and strange in their words and behaviour
- Those who dress in clothes that don’t fit their identity or the weather
- Those who pretend to be close friends, and flatter
- Those who refuse to do security checks, and sound arrogant
- Those who frequently appear at big event venues
- Those who frequently appear around security areas
- Those who look like wanted suspects
I had assumed that the “wanted suspect look” was something most terrorists would try and avoid/disguise.
I have really enjoyed some of the Chinese government propaganda machine’s attempts to prepare for the upcoming Olympics (mostly in a bitter and angry way). They have had a number of slogans and initiatives that are alternatively hilarious or heartbreaking. For example, the following gem: “It’s civilized to queue, it’s glorious to be polite” - a slogan which encourages people to form orderly lines when waiting for subways etc. (You can read Reynolds’ description of Beijing’s “Queue Day,” held on the 11thof each month, here). There have also been campaigns against public spitting, littering, public smoking, and an intriguing project called “The Beijing Workers’ Civilization Cheering Squad.” I have no idea what the Workers’ Civilization Cheering Squad is supposed to accomplish but it brings to mind the image of construction workers breaking into coordinated bursts of applause and gymnastic routines while chanting praise for “Give Up Your Seat Day” (another initiative) - which would definitely impress me as a first time visitor to China. (more…)
Dark Lords, Muggles and Islam: Harry Potter and Mark Steyn’s “The Future Belongs to Islam” July 22, 2008
Posted by thomas in : Commentary , 1 comment so far Over here they transcend chaos and discuss freedom of speech and Mark Steyn’s tussles with politically correct Canadian bureacratic machinery. I’ve weighed in with some hasty and poorly-developed thoughts of my own, and for the most part feel largely ignorant and ill-equipped to provide much of a contribution to the discussion of free speech and the borders of the public square. So, feeling a bit self-concious and uncertain of myself I retreated into the land of children’s fiction and finished reading the final (immensely popular and successful) Harry Potter book, which I soon realized provided some valuable insight for interpreting and critiquing Mark Steyn’s article “The Future Belongs to Islam” (an excerpt from his book America Alone, which unfortunately I have not read as I was busy reading Harry Potter instead, but I am assuming that the argument advanced in the article is continued in the book).Outside the human rights circus that accompanied its publication in Canada I found Steyn’s article intriguing, funny and, at least in its characterization of Muslims and their relationship to Western Europe and North America, wrong. In the midst of the hubbub and drama of the recent human rights tribunal hearing it might be tempting to glorify the article based on its embattled status (yet another example of how Canadian Islamic Congress really shot themselves in the foot with their approach), and so outside the controversial context surrounding the article’s publication and reception I want to deal more directly with the actual content of what was written…in 2006. (Insert embarrassed cough here). So, I’m a little late with my input, and everything I say has probably already been said and said better, but at least my input includes Harry Potter references…
I just finished the final Harry Potter book, and if you’re unfamiliar with the series (ie. you’ve spent the past few years wandering in the Gobi desert, drinking yak milk, counting grains of sand) the main character is a young orphan, lonely and abused, who discovers he is a wizard, and not only a wizard, but a famous wizard who (through his parents’ loving sacrifice) caused the defeat of a powerful-evil-fascist-terrorist sort of wizard named Voldemort. Voldemort has a group of followers called “Death-Eaters” who advance a propaganda of Pureblood (meaning only wizard ancestry) superiority over Mudbloods (a pejorative term referring to the descendants of non-wizards and/or the products of intermarriage) and Muggles (or regular human beings who generally don’t wear cloaks, play high altitude games on brooms or receive invitations to visit Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry and participate in a harrowing yet ultimately satisfying quest to defeat evil, attain meaning and grow in self-knowledge). Voldemort’s ultimate goal is the elimination of impurity in the wizarding society and the establishment of himself as the eternal master of a pureblooded wizarding overclass and the books largely chronicle Harry Potter’s adventures as he grows and matures and does battle with the “Dark Lord.” (more…)